Fierce Patriots

Conservative Political News

  • Subscribe

<![CDATA[World Health Organization]]>

World Health Organization Promotes Masturbation for Children Under Four

by Leave a Comment

Are institutions sexually grooming children? If you’re searching for proof of “no,” don’t look to the United Nations.

The World Health Organization — the UN’s public health agency — devotes 68 instructive pages to kids and sex; and its recommendations would surely shock many.

Per the Standards for Sexuality Education in Europe (SSEE), babies take part in sexuality:

From birth, babies learn the value and pleasure of bodily contact, warmth and intimacy. … [F]rom birth, parents in particular send messages to their children that relate to the human body and intimacy. In other words, they are engaging in sexuality education.

On the SSEE’s list of what children should learn from birth to four years old, you’ll find the following:

  • Enjoyment and pleasure when touching one’s own body, early childhood masturbation

Little boys and girls should not only pleasure themselves; they should question whether they’re little boys and girls:

  • Gain an awareness of gender identity
  • (Possess) the right to explore gender
    identities

Moving toward maturity, children four-to-six should be able to “consolidate their gender identity” and “talk about sexual matters.”

Laura Anne Jones — Tory shadow minister for education in Wales — isn’t a fan of the guidance. As made clear to The Telegraph, she wants the WHO to dump its gender-identity endorsement:

“We must stop this pushing of harmful gender ideology into sex education in Wales and the UK, with immediate effect.”

Safe Schools Alliance spokeswoman Tanya Carter feels the same:

“An urgent inquiry is needed into how this ideology…has come to influence so much public thinking.”

But the WHO isn’t budging. An agency official insists it’s neck-deep in facts:

“Our guidelines reflect established psychological facts about children’s understanding of their bodies and psychosocial development based on decades of research.”

The Standards for Sexuality Education in Europe isn’t the UN’s only sex-plus-children endeavor. Consider its International Technical Guidance on Sexual Education (ITGSE).

From Section 2, “Understanding comprehensive sexuality education (CSE)”:

[CSE] aims to equip children and young people with knowledge, skills, attitudes and values that will empower them to: realize their health, well-being and dignity; develop respectful social and sexual relationships; consider how their choices affect their own well-being and that of others; and, understand and ensure the protection of their rights through their lives.

If I may, a reduction of the above:

[Comprehensive Sexuality Education] aims to equip children…with knowledge, skills, attitudes, and values that will empower them to…develop…sexual relationships…

Or, more succinctly:

[CSE] aims to…empower [children] to…develop…sexual relationships…

Found on the next page of the document:

These skills can help children and young people form respectful and healthy relationships with family members, peers, friends and romantic or sexual partners.

The ITGSE’s Section 7.2 — Sexual Behavior and Sexual Response — requires these “learning objectives”:

9-12 Years Old

  • Explain that many boys and girls begin to masturbate during puberty or sometimes earlier
  • Acknowledge that masturbation does not cause physical or emotional harm but should be done in private

5-8 Years Old

  • State that people show love and care for other people in different ways, including kissing, hugging, touching, and sometimes through sexual behaviors

Back to the WHO, its Standards for Sexuality Education in Europe declares children from birth to four-years-old should learn how to “express needs and wishes.” Kids nine to 12, it says, ought to understand their “gender orientation” as well as their “first sexual experience” and the “variability of sexual behavior.” Additionally, they should learn to “use modern media (mobile phones, internet) and be aware of risks and benefits associated with these tools.”

As for children six to nine, they should master all the below:

  • Sex in the media (including the internet)
  • Enjoyment and pleasure when touching one’s own body (masturbation/self-stimulation)
  • Friendship and love towards people of the same sex
  • Secret loves, first love (infatuations and “crushes,” unrequited love)

A lot has changed in the past few decades, abroad but also in America. Not long ago, sexuality was viewed near-universally as an inappropriate arena for children. But intimacy and eroticism have entered kids’ spaces.

It’s certainly present in our schools:

Nebraska Eyes Teaching Kindergarteners Gender Identity While Eleven-Year-Olds Study Pansexuality and Demigenderism

California Public Ed Teacher Training Includes Pansexuality and a Semen Exercise

WATCH: Teacher Turns His High School Classroom Into a #Pride Nightclub

Sex Education Book for ‘Good Parents’ Says to Let Your Children Watch

Teacher Warns Students Not to Judge Adults Who Want to ‘Have Sex With a Five-Year-Old’

Back to the United Nations and its World Health Organization, the institutions are moving farther away from ideas on which the world was, ’til now, united. That’s true about children and sex, but also sex in general. Evidently, they’re trusting the science:

-ALEX

See more content from me:

Women’s Brand ‘Always’ Cancels ‘Women,’ Calls Young Girls ‘Bodies With Female Sex Organs’

Hospital Worker Gets Pinched for Packing Patient’s Keister With a Commode Mat

California Justice: Hatchet-Harboring Former Bank Robber Torches Student’s Head, Gets No Prison or Probation

Find all my RedState work here.

Thank you for reading! Please sound off in the Comments section below.

-ALEX

WHO’s Tedros Fearmongers Again: World Should Prepare for ‘Even Deadlier’ Pathogen Than COVID

by Leave a Comment

These people are never going to stop, are they?

World Health Organization (WHO) head Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus not only warned on Monday that the threat of another public health crisis should not be kicked “down the road,” but the longtime fearmonger also ominously warned that the next pathogen to strike the planet could be “even deadlier” than COVID.

The World Health Organization? Same people who warned in March that “millions” will die from eating too much salt without government intervention. Please.

Anyway, while speaking before the WHO forum in Geneva, Dr. Tedros warned:

The threat of another variant emerging that causes new surges of disease and death remains. And the threat of another pathogen emerging with even deadlier potential remains. We cannot kick this can down the road. ‘When the next pandemic comes knocking – and it will – we must be ready to answer decisively, collectively, and equitably.

Ah, there’s that word: equitably. As the left reminds us, daily, everything on the planet must be equitable; by the left’s definition, of course. I could continue, here, but thankfully, self-restraint keeps me from doing so.

Although, I do wonder if the COVID Gnome™, Anthony Fauci, upon hearing the “good news,” immediately laced up his running shoes to race to the nearest TV camera when that “next pandemic comes knocking.”

Tedros’ comments came after the WHO earlier this month declared that COVID was no longer a public health emergency on a worldwide level. How convenient, huh? Why, you don’t suppose— oh, never mind.

Here’s more, via Daily Mail:

The WHO has identified nine priority diseases that pose the biggest risk to public health. They were deemed to be most risky due to a lack of treatments or their ability to cause a pandemic. COVID [remains] on the list.

[…]

The UN health agency has also warned about “Disease X,” reflecting the fact that the next pandemic could be caused by a pathogen currently unknown to cause human disease.

“Disease X.” How ominous.

Then again, if the planet is going to be stricken by an “even deadlier” pathogen than COVID-19, you have to have an ominous-sounding “working” name for it — before it happens — then you give it an even more terrible-sounding name when (if) it does. [rolling-eyes emoji]

So here’s the thing — at least one of many.

The left hyped the ever-loving hell out of the COVID-19 pandemic. Draconian lockdown mandates were imposed, wherever and whenever Biden and the Democrats could get away with them. Then the misnomered “vaccine” and subsequent “boosters” arrived, which led to post-vax complications, including fatal reactions, and further reckless rules and regulations that were imposed on the American people.

Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch recently penned a blistering opinion about the country’s pandemic response — primarily forced by Democrat politicians, mostly on the advice of the COVID Gnome — as one of “the greatest intrusions on civil liberties in the peacetime history of this country.”

Gorsuch wrote:

Executive officials across the country issued emergency decrees on a breathtaking scale. Governors and local leaders imposed lockdown orders forcing people to remain in their homes. They shuttered businesses and schools, public and private.

Fear and the desire for safety are powerful forces. They can lead to a clamor for action — almost any action — as long as someone does something to address a perceived threat. A leader or an expert who claims he can fix everything if only we do exactly as he says, can prove an irresistible force.

[Another lesson was that] the concentration of power in the hands of so few may be efficient and sometimes popular. But it does not tend toward sound government.

Amen. So excuse us, Dr. Tedros — and maybe it’s just too soon — but please spare us such talk of the next “armageddon” before, or if, it even happens. Besides, how are supposed to “prepare” for something that hasn’t happened, when we don’t even know what it might be if it does?

Oh, wait— mask up, right? Yeah, no.

The Bottom Line

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice? That one would be on me.